“When a People`s Court rules on the right to recognize the effect of a foreign arbitration agreement under Article 18 of the People`s Republic of China Act on the choice of law applicable to foreign civil relations, invoke the law that recognizes the effect of the arbitration agreement if neither party chooses an applicable law, and the application of the law in place of the arbitration proceeding will lead to a decision of recognition with respect to the effect of the arbitration agreement that differs from the law of arbitration.” The other option is the “symmetrical arrangement” or “bilateral option” clause, in which each party has the same right to invoke arbitration.7Norton Rose Fulbright International Arbitration Report October 2017, p. 25. There are also strong arguments against the validity and applicability of unilateral dispute resolution clauses. Mateina has written several articles on hot topics in arbitration proceedings and international disputes (such as unilateral dispute resolution clauses, enhanced judicial review of arbitration awards and the admissibility of anti-recourse orders outside the United Kingdom). She has also actively participated in international moot-court competitions as a competitor, coach and referee. An “asymmetric arbitration clause” or “unilateral arbitration clause” is a clause: 1Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2018, Vol 25 (I) 77-86, Bas van Zelst, page 77, page 77. In Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd  SGCA 3211Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd (2017) SGCA 32. The Singapore Court of Appeal had to decide whether the agreed asymmetric compromise clause was valid. The clause at issue is that others see the application of a AAFC and certain other general arbitration practices as a violation of art. 6 THE ECHR (for example. B (commercial) arbitration hearings are generally not publicly available, but focus on waiving the rights under Article 6 of the ECHR.35Maastricht Journal of European Comparative and Law 2018, Vol 25 (I) 77-86, Bas van Zelst, page 83.
Since the principle of arbitration itself is not contrary to Article 6 of the ECHR, it is possible to assert the rights conferred by Article 6 of the ECHR, but for the waiver to be valid, certain things must be taken into account. First, the waiver must be freely agreed. In addition, the waiver must be written and “unequivocal” 36Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2018, Vol 25 (I) 77-86, Bas van Zelst, page 84. “If the parties concerned agree that they can either apply to the arbitration arbitrator or file an appeal with the National Dispute Resolution Tribunal, the arbitration agreement is inoperative, unless one party has filed an application with the arbitration body, the other party does not propose an objection within the time limit of section 20, paragraph 2, of the arbitration law.” 18www.bjac.org.cn/english/page/ckzl/htf3.html Despite the regular application of asymmetric arbitration clauses in various dispute resolution clauses, there are no legal guidelines for the use or application of asymmetric arbitration clauses. As a result, there is some uncertainty as to the use of these clauses, especially since the validity and applicability of these clauses appear to be very different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.